My Point

Had a big argument with a self proclaimed connoisseur of the game, the 'african american' Bradman (continuing with my effort 2 b politically correct on this blogsite). He was trying to explain to me about how playing with the leather ball is a different ball game altogether and how we guys played 'gay' (dont have anything against them i am just quoting him) cricket at PCG. He also wished to inform me that playing with the leather ball was the real thing and playing at PCG didnt count. Now that comment was wierd coming from a guy who had just organized a very successful tennis ball tounament a few days bac at Penn State. If thats the way he felt then his team shouldnt have been palying the 'gay' cricket for 2 years in a row and getting thrashed by ppl from PCG in the finals. Also if the number of people showing up at PCG is any indication we have a hands down winner and someone will have to plead no contest. Coming bac to the origins of the discussion all I was trying to say was that some batsmen didnt play well according to the evidence on show yday and the self proclaimed expert would just fail to realize that we all are entitled to our own opinion specially about something like cricket that stirs up passions like no other thing can (leave the chics out of this). Nyways he ended the argument raising some stupid challenge telling me that i would get bowled 10 times in 20 minutes (thats like once almost every 4 balls bowled) if i ever batted at the PSCC grounds. I guess i shall be the bigger man and not respond at all to such churlish challenges. Best of luck to PSCC for saturdays' game i should be around to root for u guys(for u too black bradman).